Geoffrey Spear on Fri, 6 Nov 2009 10:11:11 -0700 (MST) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
Re: [s-d] [s-b] [change] Ballot for nweek 160 - 03 Nov 2009. |
On Fri, Nov 6, 2009 at 11:41 AM, Craig Daniel <teucer@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > The correct verdict appears, to me, to rest entirely on whether or not > reposting a message to the PF with the obvious intent of doing that > stuff publicly works even if you don't chop off the headers and the > > before every line. I assert that it does, and that making it > straightforward to do things to the PF is in the best interests of the > game - especially as people have been known to make such reposts with > only the letters "ttPF" rather than an explicit "I do this ttPF." This > former phrasing does not explicitly perform the actions any more than > Marr's repost-with-apology did, but we have generally accepted it in > the past. 'ttPF' is clearly a synonym for "I'm publishing the below-quoted message to the public forum". I'd argue that "sorry, I always get this wrong" isn't, especially if the quoted message clearly got something wrong other then being sent to s-d. -- Wooble _______________________________________________ spoon-discuss mailing list spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss