Re: [s-d] [s-b] CFJ 5a assigned to Panel {ais523, BobTHJ, Tiger}

Roger Hicks on Tue, 2 Jun 2009 08:41:21 -0700 (MST)

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [s-d] [s-b] CFJ 5a assigned to Panel {ais523, BobTHJ, Tiger}

To: discussion list for B Nomic <spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [s-d] [s-b] CFJ 5a assigned to Panel {ais523, BobTHJ, Tiger}
From: Roger Hicks <pidgepot@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2009 09:41:16 -0600
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=U74R/k6KTMUGacRIpKN6nv5nA5IK79LaZ0X9Nq5r3fc=; b=hO920uzY4UU+QLzruc/0HXXcnyflkSyPczEnlzuae9AezB/X+uZQ4AO6yCPy0tzKav dSObcLGaHaRoaCg+TIH1HHC+iZ2OSx16gpl46wRdXb8tQofx5vJCvwLGczUN455pYocq ABg1XeFViR0gnxfUvSz3mdYtb2tfUmNU3t2Ww=
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=JjOYVABX/2wyPVCdBZXeKWHaoFbCeC7H6XCgB1Hma+M35JU+7jyJnq21r0ontfTvAZ D+9WM5zcnneUtQFYh6qikJJXK1Pc+ffbGEJrs5kZPRGLuT5jcYd7CiyYXWm5HUaMj9LO ZIaFpAMtBBQfJcZ2b+gb7lVtVv8LGnzbwdNz4=
In-reply-to: <e99d0e9d2ba16b67804ac1ebe10c7abe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <56732cfd0905261052u346767d2u29bd75dcf2e809e2@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <56732cfd0905261055u6295c3b9wa484e7012df2ec50@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <45f964540905261130r54f5f730sfc565593acc4a795@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <56732cfd0906010714g5942d4c9idd3fccdd4a54d1c@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <7b20b46b26b8cf57b517ce7a682ddac3@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <56732cfd0906020817t53972958m5da2d4919f89ca80@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <e99d0e9d2ba16b67804ac1ebe10c7abe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

On Tue, Jun 2, 2009 at 09:29, 0x44 <bnomic@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, 2 Jun 2009 09:17:12 -0600, Roger Hicks <pidgepot@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> On Tue, Jun 2, 2009 at 08:42, 0x44 <bnomic@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>> My apologies, I did not realize that it was officially remanded to me. I
>>> answer CFJ 5 NO, and defer to the appellant's arguments.
>>>
>> Fails, NO is not a valid judgment.
>
> ...
> Rule 591/30: "YES and NO are synonymous with the judgements TRUE and FALSE
> respectively."
>
Whaddaya know....sorry I forgot about that.

BobTHJ
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss

References:
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] CFJ 5a assigned to Panel {ais523, BobTHJ, Tiger}
  - From: Roger Hicks
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] CFJ 5a assigned to Panel {ais523, BobTHJ, Tiger}
  - From: Roger Hicks
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] CFJ 5a assigned to Panel {ais523, BobTHJ, Tiger}
  - From: 0x44

Prev by Date: Re: [s-d] [s-b] CFJ 5a assigned to Panel {ais523, BobTHJ, Tiger}
Next by Date: Re: [s-d] [s-b] [IADoP] Rulekeepor election; Janitor nom
Previous by thread: Re: [s-d] [s-b] CFJ 5a assigned to Panel {ais523, BobTHJ, Tiger}
Next by thread: Re: [s-d] [s-b] [Deputy Speaker] Prerogatives
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread