Roger Hicks on Mon, 1 Jun 2009 07:14:11 -0700 (MST) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
Re: [s-d] [s-b] CFJ 5a assigned to Panel {ais523, BobTHJ, Tiger} |
On Tue, May 26, 2009 at 12:30, Jonatan Kilhamn <jonatan.kilhamn@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > 2009/5/26 Roger Hicks <pidgepot@xxxxxxxxx>: >> On Tue, May 26, 2009 at 11:52, Roger Hicks <pidgepot@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> I assign the appeal of CFJ 5 to the panel consisting of ais523, >>> BobTHJ, and Tiger. >>> >>> 5 (District Inquiry) TRUE >>> The page at >>> http://b.nomic.net/index.php?title=User:Wooble/Proposed_Ruleset&oldid=11379 >>> contains an accurate rendition of the text of each of the current >>> rules. >> >> I opine REMAND, and request the judge consider the new arguments that >> have been presented. >> > I also opine REMAND. > ATTN 0x44: The above action caused this case to be remanded to you for a new judgment. I apologize as I should have published an official CotC notice to this effect as a reminder to everyone. BobTHJ _______________________________________________ spoon-discuss mailing list spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss