0x44 on Tue, 2 Jun 2009 08:30:00 -0700 (MST)

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [s-d] [s-b] CFJ 5a assigned to Panel {ais523, BobTHJ, Tiger}

On Tue, 2 Jun 2009 09:17:12 -0600, Roger Hicks <pidgepot@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 2, 2009 at 08:42, 0x44 <bnomic@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> My apologies, I did not realize that it was officially remanded to me. I
>> answer CFJ 5 NO, and defer to the appellant's arguments.
> Fails, NO is not a valid judgment.

Rule 591/30: "YES and NO are synonymous with the judgements TRUE and FALSE

spoon-discuss mailing list