| 0x44 on Tue, 2 Jun 2009 08:30:00 -0700 (MST) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
| Re: [s-d] [s-b] CFJ 5a assigned to Panel {ais523, BobTHJ, Tiger} |
On Tue, 2 Jun 2009 09:17:12 -0600, Roger Hicks <pidgepot@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Tue, Jun 2, 2009 at 08:42, 0x44 <bnomic@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> My apologies, I did not realize that it was officially remanded to me. I >> answer CFJ 5 NO, and defer to the appellant's arguments. >> > Fails, NO is not a valid judgment. ... Rule 591/30: "YES and NO are synonymous with the judgements TRUE and FALSE respectively." _______________________________________________ spoon-discuss mailing list spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss