Re: [s-d] [s-b] Seizing an opportunity

Jonatan Kilhamn on Tue, 12 May 2009 12:28:21 -0700 (MST)

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [s-d] [s-b] Seizing an opportunity

To: discussion list for B Nomic <spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Seizing an opportunity
From: Jonatan Kilhamn <jonatan.kilhamn@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 12 May 2009 21:28:18 +0200
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=oydOO8nvSMC97LjcbzlesBGn5AyxekQjuIeTHcHLI4o=; b=azOMApKuI0hqc8UfKwe39bJ/0SbNywVOWtMWfnYu4+MelDTQeOq784xUaomeS3g2V2 0tfolUf+TDUKHjrXnI6yTXwjY8RkWRdj6g/4M1OZ2Qtxj4/gsxUHJomRKxTbmg5rS3/z CH0wVZFyYomw7D2PmUgr4SMGAVQzrls9khGro=
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=Z9kTGOqwjQap+IcT995xFnv4pyTlySdxt2AkM6IBovwVMqiM3uHLMNquODXcYAci8J nwQn0G3sekQeQ6TUqoBeK8Mrayc1iFSyWvEWMbsRq6yqW/jFI/sZr38OfSxJS/QOZXpe 5+EKWlzac/42egZW9X/rGLA9+rAd6HZkcXRjk=
In-reply-to: <653283240905121217l2a607150o43c3bd9d6a4abd24@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <45f964540905121141u62a7c96dgeaccc674828ab89@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <653283240905121153t3c80cec3ka4970be235f80306@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <45f964540905121159x57f9c30ej9db0c2dd16d78b16@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <653283240905121217l2a607150o43c3bd9d6a4abd24@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

2009/5/12 Geoffrey Spear <wooble@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
> On Tue, May 12, 2009 at 2:59 PM, Jonatan Kilhamn
> <jonatan.kilhamn@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> I deputise for the CotC to perform the following actions:
>> I rotate the bench, changing all sitting players to standing.
>
> Fails, the CotC CAN rotate the bench, but is never obligated to, so
> you can't deputise for em to do it.
>
> Still, your judge assignment is effective, just ILLEGAL. (I'd say an
> illegal action required to uphold someone's R101 right to resolve
> controversies is probably a trivial DISCHARGE, though.)
> --
Hmm. I read "SHALL NOT do so unless" as "SHALL do so if it's the only
way". But i guess "SHALL NOT unless "does not imply "SHALL if".

-- 
-Tiger
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss

References:
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] Seizing an opportunity
  - From: Jonatan Kilhamn
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] Seizing an opportunity
  - From: Geoffrey Spear

Prev by Date: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Seizing an opportunity
Next by Date: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Simplify Massively
Previous by thread: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Seizing an opportunity
Next by thread: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Seizing an opportunity
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread