Geoffrey Spear on Wed, 25 Feb 2009 08:32:05 -0700 (MST) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
Re: [s-d] [s-b] 6th Era RP revision |
On Wed, Feb 25, 2009 at 10:27 AM, James Baxter <jebaxter@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > The person who came up with that system is an idiot. Can everyone just refrain from scamming this or do I have to edit the refresh proposal again? (if we use a loose interpretation - which would be best - then I can be counted as only submitting the last RP and we can assume the others weren't submitted). Why should we assume the last one was submitted, then? The temporal prime directive forbid changing the past; you either submitted them or not. If you purport to submit a new one with the wording that you say failed before for some mystical reason, that one should be held to fail too. -- Wooble _______________________________________________ spoon-discuss mailing list spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss