Re: [s-d] [s-b] 6th Era RP revision

Geoffrey Spear on Tue, 24 Feb 2009 13:28:03 -0700 (MST)

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [s-d] [s-b] 6th Era RP revision

To: spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [s-d] [s-b] 6th Era RP revision
From: Geoffrey Spear <wooble@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 15:27:56 -0500
In-reply-to: <BAY126-W2D2E8CE30D8FFF3998DD585AF0@xxxxxxx>
References: <BAY126-W2587A9D4572BFD22EFF53785AF0@xxxxxxx> <49A449DF.7040400@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <BAY126-W34E3144C9942D92900AE6D85AF0@xxxxxxx> <1235504924.8115.39.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <BAY126-W2D2E8CE30D8FFF3998DD585AF0@xxxxxxx>

On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 3:02 PM, James Baxter <jebaxter@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Ok, I understand now. I revise and amend my Refresh Proposal to read as follows:

It's quite possible that amending RPs is impossible; the rule says
"PEPs and the Emergency Coordinator may each submit a Refresh
Proposal."

In any case, a proposal to repeal all of the rules shown on a page
that uses transclusion is asking for a scam. Any edits to the 5E* rule
pages will show up on your "static" page.
-- 
Wooble
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] 6th Era RP revision
  - From: James Baxter

References:
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] 6th Era RP
  - From: Ed Murphy
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] 6th Era RP
  - From: James Baxter
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] 6th Era RP
  - From: Alex Smith

Prev by Date: Re: [s-d] [s-b] 6th Era RP
Next by Date: Re: [s-d] [s-b] 6th Era RP revision
Previous by thread: Re: [s-d] [s-b] 6th Era RP
Next by thread: Re: [s-d] [s-b] 6th Era RP revision
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread