James Baxter on Tue, 24 Feb 2009 13:59:46 -0700 (MST)


[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [s-d] [s-b] 6th Era RP revision


I have used the permanent links to avoid scamming and, even if I can't resubmit or amend, thewn we can all just stop being retarded monkeys and use the non-greedy interpretation.

 

> Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 15:27:56 -0500
> From: wooble@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> To: spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: [s-d] [s-b] 6th Era RP revision
> 
> On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 3:02 PM, James Baxter <jebaxter@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > Ok, I understand now. I revise and amend my Refresh Proposal to read as follows:
> 
> It's quite possible that amending RPs is impossible; the rule says
> "PEPs and the Emergency Coordinator may each submit a Refresh
> Proposal."
> 
> In any case, a proposal to repeal all of the rules shown on a page
> that uses transclusion is asking for a scam. Any edits to the 5E* rule
> pages will show up on your "static" page.


_________________________________________________________________

Hotmail, Messenger, Photos  and more - all with the new Windows Live. Get started! 
http://www.download.live.com/
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss