James Baxter on Tue, 24 Feb 2009 13:59:46 -0700 (MST) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
Re: [s-d] [s-b] 6th Era RP revision |
I have used the permanent links to avoid scamming and, even if I can't resubmit or amend, thewn we can all just stop being retarded monkeys and use the non-greedy interpretation. > Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 15:27:56 -0500 > From: wooble@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx > To: spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx > Subject: Re: [s-d] [s-b] 6th Era RP revision > > On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 3:02 PM, James Baxter <jebaxter@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Ok, I understand now. I revise and amend my Refresh Proposal to read as follows: > > It's quite possible that amending RPs is impossible; the rule says > "PEPs and the Emergency Coordinator may each submit a Refresh > Proposal." > > In any case, a proposal to repeal all of the rules shown on a page > that uses transclusion is asking for a scam. Any edits to the 5E* rule > pages will show up on your "static" page. _________________________________________________________________ Hotmail, Messenger, Photos and more - all with the new Windows Live. Get started! http://www.download.live.com/ _______________________________________________ spoon-discuss mailing list spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss