Re: [s-d] [s-b] Emergency, part I

Geoffrey Spear on Mon, 23 Feb 2009 14:20:09 -0700 (MST)

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [s-d] [s-b] Emergency, part I

To: discussion list for B Nomic <spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Emergency, part I
From: Geoffrey Spear <wooble@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2009 16:20:00 -0500
In-reply-to: <55b258c20902231318h22bbad35xa5c598cdf14cbd5f@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <653283240902231248w22c25a04l59e6bb73f26b7d15@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <784a579e0902231258y1fd5e058m69e3ba9fde5928a2@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <653283240902231305q54dc2fckc81096e21e6bf5cb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <55b258c20902231318h22bbad35xa5c598cdf14cbd5f@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 4:18 PM, Craig Daniel <teucer@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> At one time in the early first era it is unclear whether the rules or
> the ruleset defined how to play. I believe it was the former, but iff
> it was the latter the ruleset had broken comments from the get-go.

Well, reconciling that gamestate can be Emergency Part IV.
-- 
Wooble
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss

References:
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] Emergency, part I
  - From: Elliott Hird
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] Emergency, part I
  - From: Geoffrey Spear
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] Emergency, part I
  - From: Craig Daniel

Prev by Date: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Emergency, part I
Next by Date: Re: [s-d] [s-b] The gamestate of B Nomic
Previous by thread: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Emergency, part I
Next by thread: Re: [s-d] [s-b] The gamestate of B Nomic
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread