Re: [s-d] [s-b] Emergency, part I

Craig Daniel on Mon, 23 Feb 2009 14:18:11 -0700 (MST)

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [s-d] [s-b] Emergency, part I

To: discussion list for B Nomic <spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Emergency, part I
From: Craig Daniel <teucer@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2009 16:18:05 -0500
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:sender:received:in-reply-to :references:date:x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=OLo3CGFfrxa/Zu6Pq7l7wU/Vc9BuTF3KgDNNBf8RnrE=; b=X393zjFYfAy3uTU6pabY06SfgX1Eb4aJ2Uyv13WWTp9EUxJfkhuBEpwHgzITj6yKcQ bn0FsF595nt4WUSkQYaGEa9GQQ8WuBUqmmyRHjN5UnTBiIwEf2n0QWLVKR8V1ZGSI2r2 OilDhEEG7cxaCZOQlPVzKNjSrTZFO9kUqYFi0=
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; b=aE4NjcmzFz0Zwn4JB47vDvyIQbyrIGJZFAe+uZsVuMxpAvcLrASYU7EwE/NpFSEx8L qOF92ipC7TXlqhiNCQJgCyTASZbshsQFzps6869vtIyaGB43tTeC68r8Q4DlzMw0+PR+ xYFPcrtebKZfOugfOusi4oXjPTuIN6378cWf8=
In-reply-to: <653283240902231305q54dc2fckc81096e21e6bf5cb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <653283240902231248w22c25a04l59e6bb73f26b7d15@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <784a579e0902231258y1fd5e058m69e3ba9fde5928a2@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <653283240902231305q54dc2fckc81096e21e6bf5cb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 4:05 PM, Geoffrey Spear <wooble@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 3:58 PM, Elliott Hird
> <penguinofthegods@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> 2009/2/23 Geoffrey Spear <wooble@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
>>> I believe the Ruleset platonically includes the Rule archived at
>>> http://b.nomic.net/index.php?title=Rule_4E0&oldid=1928
>>
>> It would iff era 1 wasn't broken. It was.
>
> How so?  At the very least the Proposals rule didn't acquire broken
> comments until the 3rd era.

At one time in the early first era it is unclear whether the rules or
the ruleset defined how to play. I believe it was the former, but iff
it was the latter the ruleset had broken comments from the get-go.
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] Emergency, part I
  - From: Geoffrey Spear

References:
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] Emergency, part I
  - From: Elliott Hird
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] Emergency, part I
  - From: Geoffrey Spear

Prev by Date: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Emergency, part I
Next by Date: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Emergency, part I
Previous by thread: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Emergency, part I
Next by thread: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Emergency, part I
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread