Elliott Hird on Sat, 21 Feb 2009 12:42:13 -0700 (MST) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
Re: [s-d] About A Nomic |
No, no, BAYES! On 2009-02-21, Alex Smith <ais523@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Sat, 2009-02-21 at 12:03 -0500, Jamie Dallaire wrote: >> I suggest: "is a human". To me, the point of this rule is to exclude sock >> puppets. This being nomic, we can always revise "is a human" in the event >> that we become aware of some non-human entity that is desirous and capable >> of playing the game in a creative and productive manner. > > The AFO scowls in your direction. > > -- > ais523 > > _______________________________________________ > spoon-discuss mailing list > spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx > http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss > _______________________________________________ spoon-discuss mailing list spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss