Elliott Hird on Sat, 21 Feb 2009 12:42:13 -0700 (MST)


[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [s-d] About A Nomic


No, no, BAYES!

On 2009-02-21, Alex Smith <ais523@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Sat, 2009-02-21 at 12:03 -0500, Jamie Dallaire wrote:
>> I suggest: "is a human". To me, the point of this rule is to exclude sock
>> puppets. This being nomic, we can always revise "is a human" in the event
>> that we become aware of some non-human entity that is desirous and capable
>> of playing the game in a creative and productive manner.
>
> The AFO scowls in your direction.
>
> --
> ais523
>
> _______________________________________________
> spoon-discuss mailing list
> spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss
>
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss