Re: [s-d] About A Nomic

Alex Smith on Sat, 21 Feb 2009 10:08:37 -0700 (MST)

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [s-d] About A Nomic

To: discussion list for B Nomic <spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [s-d] About A Nomic
From: Alex Smith <ais523@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 21 Feb 2009 17:08:30 +0000
In-reply-to: <44e5a2650902210903g422c1ad5v971d71a6acf633a8@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <6bf32280902191132q26a274ccl95d3b596052cb4a3@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <ca8a6ddc0902191350t7cba797o5550e035b42a3af2@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <44e5a2650902210903g422c1ad5v971d71a6acf633a8@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

On Sat, 2009-02-21 at 12:03 -0500, Jamie Dallaire wrote:
> I suggest: "is a human". To me, the point of this rule is to exclude sock
> puppets. This being nomic, we can always revise "is a human" in the event
> that we become aware of some non-human entity that is desirous and capable
> of playing the game in a creative and productive manner.

The AFO scowls in your direction.

-- 
ais523

_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [s-d] About A Nomic
  - From: Elliott Hird

References:
- [s-d] About A Nomic
  - From: comex
- Re: [s-d] About A Nomic
  - From: Cassie Bayer
- Re: [s-d] About A Nomic
  - From: Jamie Dallaire

Prev by Date: Re: [s-d] About A Nomic
Next by Date: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Motion to Add
Previous by thread: Re: [s-d] About A Nomic
Next by thread: Re: [s-d] About A Nomic
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread