Alexander Smith on Mon, 16 Feb 2009 14:12:25 -0700 (MST) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
Re: [s-d] [s-b] As per Wooble's Refresh update |
Billy Pilgrim wrote: > And have been vaguely wondering why PoOs are relevant if we have an 8-year > old gamestate, and vice versa... (Or is the old gamestate no longer > relevant??) It's part of a gamestate reunification measure. IIRC, people are trying to organise all possible gamestates to have the Unrest rule in, so that the point of order thing works. I suspect that in some cases, though, they're too late. -- ais523
<<winmail.dat>>
_______________________________________________ spoon-discuss mailing list spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss