Geoffrey Spear on Mon, 16 Feb 2009 14:03:22 -0700 (MST) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
Re: [s-d] [s-b] As per Wooble's Refresh update |
On Mon, Feb 16, 2009 at 3:51 PM, Craig Daniel <teucer@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > It can't be the union of all rulesets from passed Points of Order, > because several of them require that the whole ruleset be replaced > with their contents (rather than having their contents added to the > ruleset) and thus don't get to coexist. So whichever one resolves last > wins - except that they resolve simultaneously. Clearly, the answer is that all of the PoOs that replace the whole ruleset get to take turns writing to a Ruleset document one character at a time, and we argue about how to translate the resulting document into English from Ancient B. -- Wooble _______________________________________________ spoon-discuss mailing list spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss