Re: [s-d] [s-b] An Immodest Proposal

Ed Murphy on Mon, 16 Feb 2009 14:17:29 -0700 (MST)

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [s-d] [s-b] An Immodest Proposal

To: spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [s-d] [s-b] An Immodest Proposal
From: Ed Murphy <emurphy42@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 13:17:33 -0800
In-reply-to: <55b258c20902141702n2c4bdfao9b7a2a756e8989c3@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <55b258c20902140957u6e960bc9u1d9734debf248fb9@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <55b258c20902141702n2c4bdfao9b7a2a756e8989c3@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.1.19) Gecko/20081209 Thunderbird/2.0.0.19 Mnenhy/0.7.5.0

teucer wrote:

> Rule 2e104/0 (Power=3)
> B may not be A Nomic, but it is a Nomic (Essential)
> 
> In the interest of safeguarding Agora's nomic-ness, if a change to the

You missed a bit.
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] An Immodest Proposal
  - From: Craig Daniel

Prev by Date: Re: [s-d] [s-b] As per Wooble's Refresh update
Next by Date: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Unrest update
Previous by thread: Re: [s-d] [s-b] An Immodest Proposal
Next by thread: Re: [s-d] [s-b] An Immodest Proposal
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread