Re: [s-d] [s-b] Status quo

comex on Sat, 14 Feb 2009 14:12:28 -0700 (MST)

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [s-d] [s-b] Status quo

To: discussion list for B Nomic <spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Status quo
From: comex <comexk@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 14 Feb 2009 16:12:22 -0500
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=nx62e+jreXOExNVuKcqwpiME5uUTs9sTVXDPzB+Dy7g=; b=EgCNxtHINX9nGGZFxLfpM0vOizyKr4xz+g1bz4IpUnLx6BGCTSxALcEL6QKKjHHlcO hx1Vwy6nBwfNBR3zhytE/rid9A0rKii89UvpWMJmMkYpYFWylmjfNNOpvPQhPcdoNWH3 rMSKWTOBvXD9J6gJyp8V8p1w/FyDq8VF73RA8=
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=LhNRTUGwXXjtAt3jQrQesHciXokRWXhzZ6zz6um+bODIroYUEVEcsIOMPFt3geGJd2 NgOqnukCq+7ZYWb5Yu6au9XbLb0H8iwcJxI3tuf9A169NxEJ9Z/M8TpcejLSqZ7wHqOX Y5AciSgzcov/VQExMZf38x8hHiO6uv3Qm05js=
In-reply-to: <504388.23269.qm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <4996DC23.7020709@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <784a579e0902140720k633e0cf9x7cb01ae7bc307f54@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4996F33B.6080406@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <50b58cbd0902141030v31d60e1fud377c8842e49eea8@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <504388.23269.qm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

On Sat, Feb 14, 2009 at 2:46 PM, Justin Ahmann
<quesmarktion@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> If we never use that format, it is immaterial.
>
> I think it would be hard to succinctly convey the obvious meaning, particularly in the case of something like {a[[b[[c]]d}.

Not to mention that with a false negative-- text incorrectly
interpreted as uncommented-- the worst that happens is some
explanatory text becomes law, which is unlikely to change anything.
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss

References:
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] Status quo
  - From: Sgeo
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] Status quo
  - From: Justin Ahmann

Prev by Date: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Status Quo + 1
Next by Date: Re: [s-d] [s-b] An Immodest Proposal
Previous by thread: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Status quo
Next by thread: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Status quo
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread