Re: [s-d] [s-b] Status quo

Cassie Bayer on Sat, 14 Feb 2009 13:02:24 -0700 (MST)

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [s-d] [s-b] Status quo

To: discussion list for B Nomic <spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Status quo
From: Cassie Bayer <kisse.bnomic@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 14 Feb 2009 12:02:20 -0800
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=TGXWfktKK1590Dhm2f26jCOGMhtUHnTmW0zxvFo4TMI=; b=uqs6rjAlhZg5cFMOQ30kQ5YAbXopOmA7JglExGpbfxOSvJiLuDJbvRN/8Ea1o/TN1X Met3IH9hRjBttIC4hE4AeQLNjhMZtgbBnw1jnPdJlM9W9DFsXIDqfkxY3FcBpEsL0rAc gKU5RQEMvU8SNnvZOk4xXli/pl+DmyDkMRbHo=
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=qQHgeAs9zvwsj8jGbtsqtiNj8I12u80dddoskUz5hObVXlYNe3ap4PHcg3D5R8u78R pakNadGgXo+sGi+kFxaH/xGpKwnyycDazqI4ebqCqRYSOLOXtvAOrJuMuOz6I11mPqQH cacHVwIY4VDP9xKa1Z0yce8mM/uhDp9CAT91Q=
In-reply-to: <504388.23269.qm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <4996DC23.7020709@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <784a579e0902140720k633e0cf9x7cb01ae7bc307f54@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4996F33B.6080406@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <50b58cbd0902141030v31d60e1fud377c8842e49eea8@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <504388.23269.qm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

2009/2/14 Justin Ahmann <quesmarktion@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>

> If we never use that format, it is immaterial.
>
> I think it would be hard to succinctly convey the obvious meaning,
> particularly in the case of something like {a[[b[[c]]d}.
>
> Codae
>


We only need ensure that such "out of bound" formats do not occur in the
proposed ruleset, and then require something to the effect that all new
proposals need be "well formed".  Thus, if they contain ambiguous comment
resolution, then they would be disallowed.
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss

References:
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] Status quo
  - From: Sgeo
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] Status quo
  - From: Justin Ahmann

Prev by Date: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Status quo
Next by Date: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Status quo
Previous by thread: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Status quo
Next by thread: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Status quo
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread