Re: [s-d] [s-b] Status quo

[Justin Ahmann <quesmarktion@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

If we never use that format, it is immaterial.

I think it would be hard to succinctly convey the obvious meaning, particularly in the case of something like {a[[b[[c]]d}.

Codae




________________________________
From: Sgeo <sgeoster@xxxxxxxxx>
To: spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
Sent: Saturday, February 14, 2009 1:30:26 PM
Subject: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Status quo

On Sat, Feb 14, 2009 at 11:37 AM, Ed Murphy <emurphy42@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> ehird wrote:
>
>> 2009/2/14 Ed Murphy <emurphy42@xxxxxxxxxxxx>:
>>> Point of Order:  Set the ruleset to match
>>>  http://b.nomic.net/index.php/Rules
>>> at the time this Point of Order was submitted.
>>
>> Pls include pedantic comment fix. I vote AGAINST the above Point of Order.
>
> Point of Order:  Set the ruleset to match
>  http://b.nomic.net/index.php/Rules
> at the time this Point of Order was submitted, except with the following
> change:  Amend Rule 5E7 (Game Documents) by replacing the paragraph
> beginning "In every Game Document" with this text:
>
>      In every Game Document, with the exception of this paragraph, text
>      between a forward slash+asterisk character combination and the
>      next asterisk+forward slash character combination ("/*" and "*/")
>      or between a double open bracket character combination and the
>      next double close bracket character combination ("[[" and "]]")
>      shall be deemed Comment Text. Comment Text has no direct effect on
>      the state of the game, although it should generally guide
>      interpretation of the Game Document in which it appears.
>

So, in a[[b[[c]]d]]e, d is not commented out?
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss