bnomic on Tue, 10 Feb 2009 08:18:46 -0700 (MST) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
Re: [s-d] [s-b] A gamestate clarification request to the Administrator |
On Tue, 10 Feb 2009 14:32:41 +0000, Elliott Hird <penguinofthegods@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > I agree. I've never argued with trying to break the game - just > picking a literal interpretation of what the rules actually say. > > In this case, the sane interpretation is one perfectly literal > possibility. Let's pick it. As worded the Comment clause of Rule 5e7 (and because it's word-for-word as written from 2006 all of its ancestors) is a greedy matching algorithm. If it were non-greedy, it would explicitly state that comments are from the delimiter to the first closing delimiter. _______________________________________________ spoon-discuss mailing list spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss