|
Elliott Hird on Tue, 10 Feb 2009 07:32:49 -0700 (MST)
|
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
|
Re: [s-d] [s-b] A gamestate clarification request to the Administrator
|
- To: discussion list for B Nomic <spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [s-d] [s-b] A gamestate clarification request to the Administrator
- From: Elliott Hird <penguinofthegods@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2009 14:32:41 +0000
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:reply-to:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=LEhOy2/EGuXaPJwFgmv9GH2JYO5ANhfqyV3tbBbfxTg=; b=lejzQwE6Gv7ZC+uBlqJ9W9TsNM8ab4EBxG8rH5EuY4bBxlLN6CLlWyY5Sjqe9/+xAe 1uvGnOenYxo9aren5Vf0tTGU/nXySXerRteKl9MwHtN3sum82kX95Ln2xVwq+imDwYXf tavnZLOmBcOhyhMk1h7k77fPG3BokmTEo2YLI=
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:reply-to:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :subject:from:to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=GP0HLUiiO1iOqvLXcaP5Bu0vivqKbz0Wl9LndA1XYXCArT36sD51gBMN4n/nJUK9be MN84goiFOvB3nwLk3QmeWGiYxFp2U/ug9oNaRCwzcOOo5CN7hziw9s9dIF7zaoe++9wN +P3MxJdQjdGrRHmq1asKES8e3j6l0w9Q0Uj8Y=
- In-reply-to: <BAY126-W49191197A16EE0FC13FF1B85BD0@xxxxxxx>
- References: <1234204154.8108.6.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1234205001.8108.13.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <BAY126-W49191197A16EE0FC13FF1B85BD0@xxxxxxx>
2009/2/10 James Baxter <jebaxter@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
>
> This whole debate is pointless and worthy only of a developmentally challenged monkey.
>
>
>
> The following text is between "[[" and "]]" in ais523's quote:
>
>
> An online UTC clock is available at http://www.time.gov/.
> Thus, if it is currently the middle of nday 2, something happening "in 2 ndays" will occur at the end of nday 4.
> Those two sentences have no real impact on the game and to anyone with any common sense it should be obvious that the comments end at the "]]" symbol. What is it with you people and taking the most game breaking interpretation?
I agree. I've never argued with trying to break the game - just
picking a literal interpretation of what the rules actually say.
In this case, the sane interpretation is one perfectly literal
possibility. Let's pick it.
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss