Elliott Hird on Sat, 7 Feb 2009 07:36:51 -0700 (MST)


[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [s-d] [s-b] Asplosion!!!!!!


2009/2/7 Ed Murphy <emurphy42@xxxxxxxxxxxx>:
> Since "ambiguity" is not formally defined by the rules, it must be
> interpreted.  Interpreting it using this low a threshold is begging
> for Massive Gamestate Recalculation on a regular basis.

Ambiguity is left up to Ministers and the Consultation system.

I'll let someone else call the Consultation.

BTW: being very literal is an easy way to avoid recalculation.
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss