Elliott Hird on Sat, 7 Feb 2009 07:36:51 -0700 (MST) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
Re: [s-d] [s-b] Asplosion!!!!!! |
2009/2/7 Ed Murphy <emurphy42@xxxxxxxxxxxx>: > Since "ambiguity" is not formally defined by the rules, it must be > interpreted. Interpreting it using this low a threshold is begging > for Massive Gamestate Recalculation on a regular basis. Ambiguity is left up to Ministers and the Consultation system. I'll let someone else call the Consultation. BTW: being very literal is an easy way to avoid recalculation. _______________________________________________ spoon-discuss mailing list spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss