Re: [s-d] [s-b] Asplosion!!!!!!

[Ed Murphy <emurphy42@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

teucer wrote:

> Unfortunately, without any indication of where the Supplicant intended
> the Consultation to begin and end, there's no reason to leave out eir
> signature and the word "whether", so the submission of the
> Consultation, like that of the Proposal, was ambiguous. Those terms
> don't do anything and are thus irrelevant to the effects of the
> Proposal or the Consultation, but they still create ambiguity,
> invalidating the game actions in question.

Since "ambiguity" is not formally defined by the rules, it must be
interpreted.  Interpreting it using this low a threshold is begging
for Massive Gamestate Recalculation on a regular basis.
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss