Jamie Dallaire on Tue, 27 Jan 2009 09:09:08 -0700 (MST)


[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [s-d] Oooops Priests


On Tue, Jan 27, 2009 at 9:04 AM, Elliott Hird <
penguinofthegods@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

>
> On 27 Jan 2009, at 06:31, Ed Murphy wrote:
>
>  I interpret "has been assigned to" as "has been continuously assigned
>> to".
>>
>
> Really? cuz I don't.


Yeah, me neither. That's a reeeeeaaaaally selective reading.

That said, the issue is (almost) moot now that Murphy's tweak fixed things,
including ordainment.

The only issue to my mind is whether any of the Priests for other
consultations were automatically removed from those consultations when
auto-defrocked, even though they are once again newly-frocked.
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss