Re: [s-d] [s-b] Oooops Priests

[Jamie Dallaire <bad.leprechaun@xxxxxxxxx>]

On Tue, Jan 27, 2009 at 1:44 AM, Ed Murphy <emurphy42@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Billy Pilgrim wrote:
>
> > I submit and intend to Activate the following Tweak:
> > {
> > In Rule 5E36, replace the passage:
> > {{and has not answered a Consultation he has been assigned to within a
> > Jiffy}}
> > by:
> > {{and has not answered or requested the ZOTTING of a Consultation he has
> > been assigned to within a Jiffy from that Consultation's assignment to
> him}}
> >
> > Players who have lost the Ordained Property during the current nweek
> because
> > they failed to Answer a Consultation that they requested be ZOTTED gain
> the
> > Ordained Property.
> > }
>
> The Tweak that I just activated already replaced that passage (and
> fixed the underlying problem in the process, I think).


ooo, yes it did. Well then I won't bother with this one.

BP
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss