Re: [s-d] [s-b] Oooops Priests

[Ed Murphy <emurphy42@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Billy Pilgrim wrote:

> I submit and intend to Activate the following Tweak:
> {
> In Rule 5E36, replace the passage:
> {{and has not answered a Consultation he has been assigned to within a
> Jiffy}}
> by:
> {{and has not answered or requested the ZOTTING of a Consultation he has
> been assigned to within a Jiffy from that Consultation's assignment to him}}
> 
> Players who have lost the Ordained Property during the current nweek because
> they failed to Answer a Consultation that they requested be ZOTTED gain the
> Ordained Property.
> }

The Tweak that I just activated already replaced that passage (and
fixed the underlying problem in the process, I think).
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss