Elliott Hird on Sun, 25 Jan 2009 09:01:25 -0700 (MST)


[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [s-d] [s-b] Beast Trick - nday 1, nweek 155 


On 25 Jan 2009, at 15:52, Ed Murphy wrote:


It was, in the overall sense of "this should either work completely or
have no effect", with assertions borrowed from other fields as shorthand 
for "if the assertion is false then rollback".  What other significant
sense do you have in mind?
It was all simultaneous - i.e., you couldn't make them paradoxical because 
it wasn't iterative.
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss