Re: [s-d] [s-b] Beast Trick - nday 1, nweek 155

Elliott Hird on Sun, 25 Jan 2009 06:59:36 -0700 (MST)

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [s-d] [s-b] Beast Trick - nday 1, nweek 155

To: discussion list for B Nomic <spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Beast Trick - nday 1, nweek 155
From: Elliott Hird <penguinofthegods@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 25 Jan 2009 13:59:40 +0000
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:mime-version:in-reply-to :references:content-type:message-id:content-transfer-encoding:from :subject:date:to:x-mailer; bh=Eo6djUuSVOZSGukE2OCxfJw/bs+GS4qFF/8HMbEzPug=; b=SIUDS+PeR3zN9JKtuk3mcWxw1O0ka2z98J5KRGPKsXemjG21i+jPd4d5rXhupUgpWo 1RfKexi2tINcIz8pE0SKVUb5jSBUXFVK9aJoa1s8HvRSKg8OHNfd5YkKyanGCmy2O/1a aOjRhaA8BqnRI6rgTvxA0RcYROaVoN8qLJvUI=
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:content-type:message-id :content-transfer-encoding:from:subject:date:to:x-mailer; b=cl2dwk/o/Sz29EHVD23lVh+TwAPMy8BQMF+RX+MnhL+r1nYWZGFAX5v9e64uezgBrK oVu2zqSI12sS5EKhPhIhPzS8Qi8PhXQVYtWBx7luU1VJ5r8eqaKzgFFmIArJCZRXXdzQ 92O6Obpr1I3h4888cVgsh6V890zEV8Ll5ezkc=
In-reply-to: <497BEA43.6090402@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <mailbox-25915-1232845365-810654@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <413359.90423.qm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <44e5a2650901241708qaef442ax383062349d668404@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <497BC716.8070108@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <3E7E91B8-7B43-4817-8914-54B0E195F68C@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <497BEA43.6090402@xxxxxxxxxxxx>


On 25 Jan 2009, at 04:27, Ed Murphy wrote:

Ordinary language is implicitly accepted.  What about common technical
jargon, which concept the relevant ex-rule matched?


It was not the same as SQL transactions.
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] Beast Trick - nday 1, nweek 155
  - From: Ed Murphy

References:
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] Beast Trick - nday 1, nweek 155
  - From: Jamie Dallaire
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] Beast Trick - nday 1, nweek 155
  - From: Ed Murphy
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] Beast Trick - nday 1, nweek 155
  - From: 0x44
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] Beast Trick - nday 1, nweek 155
  - From: Ed Murphy

Prev by Date: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Beast Trick - nday 1, nweek 155
Next by Date: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Beast Trick - nday 1, nweek 155
Previous by thread: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Beast Trick - nday 1, nweek 155
Next by thread: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Beast Trick - nday 1, nweek 155
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread