Re: [s-d] [s-b] Beast Trick - nday 1, nweek 155

Ed Murphy on Sat, 24 Jan 2009 21:30:40 -0700 (MST)

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [s-d] [s-b] Beast Trick - nday 1, nweek 155

To: discussion list for B Nomic <spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Beast Trick - nday 1, nweek 155
From: Ed Murphy <emurphy42@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 24 Jan 2009 20:27:47 -0800
In-reply-to: <3E7E91B8-7B43-4817-8914-54B0E195F68C@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <mailbox-25915-1232845365-810654@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <413359.90423.qm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <44e5a2650901241708qaef442ax383062349d668404@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <497BC716.8070108@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <3E7E91B8-7B43-4817-8914-54B0E195F68C@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.1.19) Gecko/20081209 Thunderbird/2.0.0.19 Mnenhy/0.7.5.0

0x44 wrote:

> On Jan 24, 2009, at 19:57, Ed Murphy <emurphy42@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>>
>>>
> 
>> the definition remains part of game custom
>> and usable as such.

> Perhaps in some other nomic type game you play. In B, game custom is
> that only the rules have bearing.

Ordinary language is implicitly accepted.  What about common technical
jargon, which concept the relevant ex-rule matched?
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] Beast Trick - nday 1, nweek 155
  - From: Elliott Hird

References:
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] Beast Trick - nday 1, nweek 155
  - From: Jamie Dallaire
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] Beast Trick - nday 1, nweek 155
  - From: Ed Murphy
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] Beast Trick - nday 1, nweek 155
  - From: 0x44

Prev by Date: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Beast Trick - nday 1, nweek 155
Next by Date: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Beast Trick - nday 1, nweek 155
Previous by thread: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Beast Trick - nday 1, nweek 155
Next by thread: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Beast Trick - nday 1, nweek 155
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread