Re: [s-d] [s-b] (no subject)

[Craig Daniel <teucer@xxxxxxxxx>]

On Fri, Jan 23, 2009 at 5:51 PM, Elliott Hird
<penguinofthegods@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On 23 Jan 2009, at 22:38, Craig Daniel wrote:
>
>> How about if, instead, we give Priests the power to add explanatory
>> comment text to the rules? That way it's there to clarify things, but
>> to actually fix the problems that you judge are present you have to
>> use the normal ruleset-tinkering mechanisms.
>
> Comments aren't part of game documents. Anyone can just add them to the PD
> as they do not change the gamestate.

They don't have any game-mechanical effect, but the comments found in
the rules are part of the rules and can be no more changed at will
than the titles.
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss