Re: [s-d] [s-b] (no subject)

Elliott Hird on Fri, 23 Jan 2009 15:51:01 -0700 (MST)

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [s-d] [s-b] (no subject)

To: discussion list for B Nomic <spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [s-d] [s-b] (no subject)
From: Elliott Hird <penguinofthegods@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2009 22:51:03 +0000
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:mime-version:in-reply-to :references:content-type:message-id:content-transfer-encoding:from :subject:date:to:x-mailer; bh=H46G71I17qLLQEnyeZSQnEyeRsMM8xTMiGUoo/+oyrc=; b=OBNSC+8ixl5n5/KPO+v3PHecVL9IC2gP+FmgZHuU2vwNsCJevFva2n6qZK0TIIUn92 4l5tRPHIOi2aAduqk2l2uvMelYMr7ErqWXIv9S3SKO6M9Q+kBTw1yn6NQee5ofFJKB13 jQTEgqRTfwAnrwTaSVHUwwSCKEoV0+6E0IGf0=
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:content-type:message-id :content-transfer-encoding:from:subject:date:to:x-mailer; b=TvlQ6U2DjC6I2JkLj3NM/Z+Q3YkBswIE1IfrKZbAWHLm5eEOn/5R6X0SM1z7Y7iQq3 0AhU0QUx5z7DcmZLe+uJ3z4L3x737V85nEPJXu5RQjMUhiubCAg93fZkAEDeFg+e+UBD iVmk0HFFc/mis+RzK+/ka6MzHBCv9PcK73NIU=
In-reply-to: <55b258c20901231438u38e825fcp4ba9674d9c7fe219@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <467960.21565.qm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4979C41E.20802@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <44e5a2650901230758w3d058054j5c70903cf977b734@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <43AD850E-829C-432A-846C-985C610052CC@xxxxxxxxx> <44e5a2650901230825j2854ae97x9c4b1d6f7d43a@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <9BD21C76-81E3-43EF-A835-228F787D9875@xxxxxxxxx> <BAY126-W3850C561A710D9F63688B85CF0@xxxxxxx> <55b258c20901231438u38e825fcp4ba9674d9c7fe219@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>


On 23 Jan 2009, at 22:38, Craig Daniel wrote:

How about if, instead, we give Priests the power to add explanatory
comment text to the rules? That way it's there to clarify things, but
to actually fix the problems that you judge are present you have to
use the normal ruleset-tinkering mechanisms.

Comments aren't part of game documents. Anyone can just add them tothe PD as they do not change the gamestate.

_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] (no subject)
  - From: Craig Daniel

References:
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] (no subject)
  - From: 0x44
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] (no subject)
  - From: Elliott Hird
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] (no subject)
  - From: Jamie Dallaire
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] (no subject)
  - From: Elliott Hird
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] (no subject)
  - From: James Baxter
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] (no subject)
  - From: Craig Daniel

Prev by Date: Re: [s-d] [s-b] (no subject)
Next by Date: Re: [s-d] [s-b] (no subject)
Previous by thread: Re: [s-d] [s-b] (no subject)
Next by thread: Re: [s-d] [s-b] (no subject)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread