Craig Daniel on Thu, 22 Jan 2009 09:49:20 -0700 (MST)


[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [s-d] [s-b] Ordainment + Unique Game Object Names Consultation


On Thu, Jan 22, 2009 at 10:30 AM, Elliott Hird
<penguinofthegods@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On 22 Jan 2009, at 15:22, Jamie Dallaire wrote:
>
>> - Teucer/teucer... lucky duck, teucer, with your lack of capitalization...
>
> Thankfully, he registered prior to E5.

Yes. A while ago I called a Consultation on whether individual ndays
were game objects out of a fear that if the answer was yes that rule
would mean that my presence prevented nday 10 from happening in the
first nweek of the era, though. Also, the holder of the Monster may be
called whatever you want to call em, but it might be without effect.

As for weapons: I believe they have names, but we don't know what they
are - just as Fred always had a name distinct from "the OCB", but it
took an Oracularity to define what it was. For all we know my
Well-Sharpened Pencil is named Wooblesbane.

 - teucer
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss