Re: [s-d] [s-b] Ordainment + Unique Game Object Names Consultation

[Jamie Dallaire <bad.leprechaun@xxxxxxxxx>]

On Thu, Jan 22, 2009 at 10:04 AM, Elliott Hird <
penguinofthegods@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

>
> On 22 Jan 2009, at 15:03, Jamie Dallaire wrote:
>
>  I submit the following Consultation:
>> {
>> Question: Does Marr965 own a Well-sharpened pencil?
>>
>> Reasoning: Rule 5E42 states that "No Game Object may come to have the same
>> name as another Game Object." According to 5E49, an instance of a Weapon
>> is
>> created in a Player's possession when e Purchases it. When Marr965
>> attempted
>> to Purchase a Well-sharpened pencil, Ivan Hope already owned such a
>> Weapon.
>> Was this Game Action prevented by 5E42?
>> }
>>
>
> the well-sharped pencil is the name of the Weapon type, not the instance of
> the Weapon.


I agree that that is how the rule is phrased. The word type is used
specifically. 5E49 also says:

"All Weapons have a Name"

Weapons refers to a specific pencil, not to the category/type pencil (or any
other type). So what are the names of the pencils owned by Marr965 and Ivan
Hope?

BP
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss