Re: [s-d] [s-b] Ordainment + Unique Game Object Names Consultation

[Jamie Dallaire <bad.leprechaun@xxxxxxxxx>]

On Thu, Jan 22, 2009 at 10:16 AM, Jamie Dallaire
<bad.leprechaun@xxxxxxxxx>wrote:

> On Thu, Jan 22, 2009 at 10:04 AM, Elliott Hird <
> penguinofthegods@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>>
>> On 22 Jan 2009, at 15:03, Jamie Dallaire wrote:
>>
>>  I submit the following Consultation:
>>> {
>>> Question: Does Marr965 own a Well-sharpened pencil?
>>>
>>> Reasoning: Rule 5E42 states that "No Game Object may come to have the
>>> same
>>> name as another Game Object." According to 5E49, an instance of a Weapon
>>> is
>>> created in a Player's possession when e Purchases it. When Marr965
>>> attempted
>>> to Purchase a Well-sharpened pencil, Ivan Hope already owned such a
>>> Weapon.
>>> Was this Game Action prevented by 5E42?
>>> }
>>>
>>
>> the well-sharped pencil is the name of the Weapon type, not the instance
>> of the Weapon.
>
>
> I agree that that is how the rule is phrased. The word type is used
> specifically. 5E49 also says:
>
> "All Weapons have a Name"
>
> Weapons refers to a specific pencil, not to the category/type pencil (or
> any other type). So what are the names of the pencils owned by Marr965 and
> Ivan Hope?
>
> BP


Also, this whole 5E42 might have the potential to screw up a lot of
things...

- Switches, if they are Game Objects (there was a consultation on this at
some point, wasn't there??). Switch rule implies that switches have names,
and that both my Vested switch and ehird's (and all's) are named "Vested"...
- Teucer/teucer... lucky duck, teucer, with your lack of capitalization...
- "The holder of a Monster is a Monsterholdor, and may be referred to by the
name of the Monster." .... maybe .....
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss