Re: [s-d] [s-b] Ehirds macks...

[Jay Campbell <bnomic@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

> More relevantly, we're not allowed to interpret things thus. I submit
> a Consultation:
> {Question: Did Nobody violate the rules by illegally interpreting a
> rule as referring to eir name?
> Unbeliever: Nobody
> Arguments: Eir statement "Come to me, pretty shiny macks..." clearly
> indicates a belief that e would own any unowned ownable game objects.}
>   

Invalid consultation, the Unbeliever must be a Player.
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss