Re: [s-d] [s-b] Ehirds macks...

[Alex Smith <ais523@xxxxxxxxxx>]

On Sun, 2009-01-04 at 17:09 +0000, Elliott Hird wrote:
> On 4 Jan 2009, at 16:57, Alex Smith wrote:
> 
> > "Nobody" is pretty surely not a game object, is it? If it is, then  
> > True
> > and False are game objects by the same reasoning, and I'm not sure  
> > that
> > makes sense.
> 
> 
> Regardless: No text in any Rule shall be interpreted as a specific  
> Player's name, unless that rule explicitly states that said text  
> shall be interpreted as a specific Player's name.
> 
That makes such an interpretation illegal, not impossible. So as far as
I can tell, such an interpretation is quite possibly correct, just
nobody's allowed to admit it.

-- 
ais523

_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss