| Alex Smith on Sun, 4 Jan 2009 09:58:12 -0700 (MST) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
| Re: [s-d] [s-b] Ehirds macks... |
On Sun, 2009-01-04 at 16:55 +0000, Elliott Hird wrote: > On 4 Jan 2009, at 16:46, M P Darke wrote: > > > Come to me, pretty shiny macks... > > Uh, where's the rule forbidding this again? I'm sure we had one. > > Anyway, this fails horribly: > No Game Object may come to have the same name as another Game Object. "Nobody" is pretty surely not a game object, is it? If it is, then True and False are game objects by the same reasoning, and I'm not sure that makes sense. -- ais523 _______________________________________________ spoon-discuss mailing list spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss