Re: [s-d] [s-b] Consultation: Is ehird still a Player?

Jamie Dallaire on Sun, 4 Jan 2009 17:00:25 -0700 (MST)

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [s-d] [s-b] Consultation: Is ehird still a Player?

To: "discussion list for B Nomic" <spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Consultation: Is ehird still a Player?
From: "Jamie Dallaire" <bad.leprechaun@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 4 Jan 2009 19:00:19 -0500
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to :subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; bh=RWf6LbG5hBparzzPCe8jHxCQ9+s2QEqdSHPiGeDo2c8=; b=pTj7fcFcqYGjdGskPgIapqsKEbVldLGlN5U/8oUTGbFFS/LGyMTFMj13laPk4bFjqW uYnuz5CmJIPFztUek1dgxa8WTkt5hziUdKl0xS8qW/ccZWlmVHt470VaGrhudBqG34Bx b7f5dXcZHSH/7R9Y+YbnePaxDhYV5zb6r7pbc=
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:references; b=pTviANR2cPcB1SmtiQBu5IUjmqv60K1HkSfUS0CwsQZGZRYgX53H0THzhOB5ISe1hb ZoqXr9OOwXo0s8Fm6whegQ1ql1rZmKDRFdZHn98tDU1TP8haDwYW3EJgt8BvkNblOXup LMOHHS8bQQnf8sCt19wOdPtSODtnelqbzipZ8=
In-reply-to: <49614B97.2010707@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <49613267.5050300@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <CB4BCBBE-8B26-4E23-BC40-BAA8195960A2@xxxxxxxxx> <44e5a2650901041545g37879385rad625452ed42d816@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <49614B97.2010707@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

On Sun, Jan 4, 2009 at 6:51 PM, Jay Campbell <bnomic@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

>
>  Oracle CAN and SHALL assign an eligible Priest.
>>
>>
>
> One correction to my own stuff, the consultation itself isn't bogus (I
> forgot any External Force can submit one)


Also, 0x44 submitted it, not ehird/penguinofthegods@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx


> Also there couldn't be a consultation 9999 anyway, "the greatest existing
> Consultation Number incremented by one" is the number. ehird very obviously
> didn't intend to do any of the actual work of the ministry, neglecting to
> even look up what the latest proposal number might be.


ehird's right about this one. Remember, we had crazy numbers like i and 86.5
a while back (made those up, probably wasn't that exactly).

BP
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss

References:
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] Consultation: Is ehird still a Player?
  - From: Jamie Dallaire
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] Consultation: Is ehird still a Player?
  - From: Jay Campbell

Prev by Date: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Contract: Protect MoM
Next by Date: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Contract: Protect MoM
Previous by thread: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Consultation: Is ehird still a Player?
Next by thread: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Consultation: Is ehird still a Player?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread