| Elliott Hird on Sun, 4 Jan 2009 10:52:13 -0700 (MST) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
| Re: [s-d] [s-b] Ehirds macks... |
On 4 Jan 2009, at 17:34, Alex Smith wrote:
That makes such an interpretation illegal, not impossible. So as far asI can tell, such an interpretation is quite possibly correct, just nobody's allowed to admit it.
No. "shall" only applies to players in that way. _______________________________________________ spoon-discuss mailing list spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss