Re: [s-d] being logical about mackerel

0x44 on Thu, 1 Jan 2009 21:47:51 -0700 (MST)

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [s-d] being logical about mackerel

To: discussion list for B Nomic <spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [s-d] being logical about mackerel
From: 0x44 <bnomic@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 01 Jan 2009 22:46:00 -0600
In-reply-to: <55b258c20901011949l37084232x50810b2000365d4a@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <BAY126-W463F7FB5E1F0F2A325B4F285E20@xxxxxxx> <495D8D4B.4060209@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <55b258c20901011949l37084232x50810b2000365d4a@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.19 (Windows/20081209)

Craig Daniel wrote:

On Thu, Jan 1, 2009 at 10:43 PM, Ed Murphy <emurphy42@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Shun the unbeliever!  Shuuuuuuuuuuuuuun!


I don't believe I named one.

 - teucer

I thought you named him in your Proposal?

--
--
0x44;

_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss

References:
- [s-d] being logical about mackerel
  - From: James Baxter
- Re: [s-d] being logical about mackerel
  - From: Ed Murphy
- Re: [s-d] being logical about mackerel
  - From: Craig Daniel

Prev by Date: Re: [s-d] being logical about mackerel
Next by Date: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Assignments of Consultations 179-187
Previous by thread: Re: [s-d] being logical about mackerel
Next by thread: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Proposal: Exceptio Probat Regulam
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread