Re: [s-d] being logical about mackerel

[Ed Murphy <emurphy42@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

James Baxter wrote:

> OK, since everyone is debating what happened to ehird's mackerel I think we should look at it logically:
>  
> 1. ehird can no longer own mackerel
> 2. the mackerel formerly owned by ehird were not explicitly destroyed
> 3. only Legal Entities can own mackerel
> 4. Nobody is not explicitly defined as a Legal Entity
> 5. the mackerel can formerly owned by ehird cannot, therefore, be owned by Nobody
> 6. if the External Force Elliott Hird becomes a Player at some point in the future, e will have m100 and all eir previously owned mackerel will be destroyed
> 7. therefore, the mackerel previously owned by ehird are unowned and cannot be used, making them irrelevant to the game and if ehird rejoins, the mackerel will be destroyed anyway so it is irrelevant what happens to them and we should just leave them alone until they are destroyed by the act of rejoining

Shun the unbeliever!  Shuuuuuuuuuuuuuun!

_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss