Re: [s-d] [s-b] Assignments of Consultations 179-187

Elliott Hird on Fri, 2 Jan 2009 07:16:21 -0700 (MST)

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [s-d] [s-b] Assignments of Consultations 179-187

To: spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Assignments of Consultations 179-187
From: Elliott Hird <penguinofthegods@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 2 Jan 2009 14:16:09 +0000
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:mime-version:in-reply-to :references:content-type:message-id:content-transfer-encoding :subject:date:to:x-mailer:from; bh=Ig61605gKTuXSPJy4d5cdKeauwsngCdfNL3Znslyxn0=; b=e97Xyx2uDsua6ETjMg4L0r99l1YqyNKwf5SkjxOaURY9P5DIyesBZ+YxgLilkysYT+ NnAR2mDmN8BwVJRuB/aArTIuzC+g7gZsazxkOVZG639tl/9OVmvuM9IHeRy7UNsHx/cb 3+tn0GmOdf6XQ+V7b5gnvjLHZnL/DyQZxXyF4=
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:content-type:message-id :content-transfer-encoding:subject:date:to:x-mailer:from; b=S6cD4mQhs1wJc/qYUuqFOJDykN3MRCSw/kKud4/G/64rWsUPIKrovmcZNDlOPsq4BL 7tZ/jxaee/9dfdYU6/6yBM5LL+MfS/QR75KYeWyBnaTWkDePEPxQugl456Bs2Ep5jfpn yZ+jruJBMoJnhmSNG3MkRGCeHFGMpTAmXfUjw=
In-reply-to: <BAY126-W560CA0E82079E6CFDCAFD785E20@xxxxxxx>
References: <7db5cba20812311526y2983f8a8i69bff80bca335064@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <285c99840812311609i557c3f34tc2acaf732884cfa5@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <BAY126-W560CA0E82079E6CFDCAFD785E20@xxxxxxx>


On 2 Jan 2009, at 11:26, James Baxter wrote:

I find this CONSISTENT as nothing can be done with the macks andthey are not being legally owned by anyone (they can't even beowned by Nobody) therfore I find a judgement that they be destroyedto be right.


WHAT IS THE RULES BASIS FROM THEM BEING DESTROYED?

nothing! Nothing!

This Consultation isn't even Influential! It doesn't make them so, itis merely FALSE!

The rules do not say they are destroyed. They simply don't. And thisconsultation can't change that.

You are all batshit insane and consistent-ing in a simply INCORRECTjudgment.

_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] Assignments of Consultations 179-187
  - From: James Baxter
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] Assignments of Consultations 179-187
  - From: Ed Murphy
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] Assignments of Consultations 179-187
  - From: Alex Smith
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] Assignments of Consultations 179-187
  - From: Warrigal

Prev by Date: Re: [s-d] being logical about mackerel
Next by Date: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Assignments of Consultations 179-187
Previous by thread: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Assignments of Consultations 179-187
Next by thread: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Assignments of Consultations 179-187
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread