Re: [s-d] [s-b] Proposal: Fix Rule 0

[Ed Murphy <emurphy42@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

teucer wrote:

> On Tue, Dec 30, 2008 at 6:55 PM, Elliott Hird
> <penguinofthegods@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> On 30 Dec 2008, at 23:42, Ed Murphy wrote:
>>
>>> This is still rife with ambiguities.  After much consideration, I
>>> suggest the following more radical revision:
>> Also, can we have provisions for initially-accessible but later closed
>> forums?
> 
> As soon as somebody's realized that a forum doesn't work, they can't
> post to it with a good-faith belief that it will work - until it comes
> back. This *does* provide for them.

That handles closed-to-receiving.  As for closed-to-sending, you can
switch over to any other forum that works, or (worst-case scenario) put
each PEP's address directly into your To: line.
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss