Craig Daniel on Tue, 30 Dec 2008 16:59:52 -0700 (MST)


[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [s-d] [s-b] Proposal: Fix Rule 0


On Tue, Dec 30, 2008 at 6:55 PM, Elliott Hird
<penguinofthegods@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On 30 Dec 2008, at 23:42, Ed Murphy wrote:
>
>> This is still rife with ambiguities.  After much consideration, I
>> suggest the following more radical revision:
>
> Also, can we have provisions for initially-accessible but later closed
> forums?

As soon as somebody's realized that a forum doesn't work, they can't
post to it with a good-faith belief that it will work - until it comes
back. This *does* provide for them.

(I'm FOR Murphy's version, btw).
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss