|
Elliott Hird on Tue, 30 Dec 2008 16:55:49 -0700 (MST)
|
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
|
Re: [s-d] [s-b] Proposal: Fix Rule 0
|
- To: discussion list for B Nomic <spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Proposal: Fix Rule 0
- From: Elliott Hird <penguinofthegods@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 30 Dec 2008 23:55:43 +0000
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:mime-version:in-reply-to :references:content-type:message-id:content-transfer-encoding :subject:date:to:x-mailer:from; bh=1t/CdRXFwoaN+fpRHbLncc53mKbFDwlyYTupxi1CizY=; b=oJQp6awJEuoCTTRi4ygn6tYg3q1TyQcIa2dfnVlVGJET5xQylvEb1E7c2eqWyiugv+ 62ayEGrnhlW4vzT9PjL7Ve97Z8rbCghJi5yYpKNw9tjMVsgUKJCf4dmf/vM3Y/aiEapo JZPVdIUaRniQMM1cgyuxg1zrCxvZZisos4CjM=
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:content-type:message-id :content-transfer-encoding:subject:date:to:x-mailer:from; b=vyW0jrLgOp0AYxbYSRhW/Eo+xkGOub+Dj55wx2PBmiPMz72yVFk7hShp/h80YnPiRB 1aDTLnsrkt3oCGRGJaVhms/vHloRSTk62v2m5o8kIpLYMqFHfcTPMIiaprjXoTb19P2K oJsX2cKw2BSgkcAWgaoy+YXfWYLfNIhLwSzSc=
- In-reply-to: <495AB1FA.8060205@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- References: <d03c700596aa05eb8a577eaf9ff5c4a8@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <495AB1FA.8060205@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
On 30 Dec 2008, at 23:42, Ed Murphy wrote:
This is still rife with ambiguities. After much consideration, I
suggest the following more radical revision:
Also, can we have provisions for initially-accessible but later
closed forums?
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss