Re: [s-d] [s-b] (no subject)

[<bnomic@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

> 
> HOWEVER, your pointing out of that precedence did make me realize why
NONE
> of these auto-deregister scams can work at all, given the current
ruleset.
> At worse, a partially successful scammer might be guilty of (# Players)
> counts of causing unwilling contract-joining, while all others would be
> guilty of breaking a single contract obligation.

Even so, if it was possible that the scams had worked it would have created
a Playership ambiguity, and due to Rule 0 the PEPs of this emergency would
not have changed. 

_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss