Re: [s-d] [s-b] (no subject)

Craig Daniel on Sun, 28 Dec 2008 23:29:03 -0700 (MST)

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [s-d] [s-b] (no subject)

To: "discussion list for B Nomic" <spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [s-d] [s-b] (no subject)
From: "Craig Daniel" <teucer@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 29 Dec 2008 01:28:58 -0500
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:sender :to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references :x-google-sender-auth; bh=VQvsd5eMoMHnBjWseakyOwWw+kARQ42gWKJVmn+v4d4=; b=FcPM6qbUvUnl0/VeNr9YcgPsJHXQludX7wiISgVLmUIf3t2A9RWcz7kC8Gogetx0e5 iLNCngDm5k2kMvBSBx1zOxlGQmbmBuzbokRGLejZXsOH3jHnqR6nn1u0ZsAdF1LUZOPs qxqLCs55tekLZ5I09kteu8r8FflUvIB8W3/gE=
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :references:x-google-sender-auth; b=inlIQZb8kbLBlfjf9Y6DfrAOqvQXyixSxEquzfof/2EyW8qA7AVvVMbR0Z3hFfK3ZI 0TgiAO0IBnuGfbN+zzBz1PS6brYhhMPf1CX/F1/JToeDULPlF1nG6l5A2xQaYlO7525E c0TMPkHHWXVc9lPWX6vCCefUhye1QzHsCrehQ=
In-reply-to: <44e5a2650812282210h2b9f67eah7241f9eba59763af@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <6bf32280812281700l4931968bx9efdcce7f99ef30d@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <6bf32280812281701t79be21d1y9691a8fb6c22bc42@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <49583032.9070707@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <55b258c20812281809j8a78ea6hc66e0976349d9421@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <44e5a2650812282129v8ad66c2y8551c9d1ef714ab1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <55b258c20812282155u39914baex48f203af67466d72@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <44e5a2650812282210h2b9f67eah7241f9eba59763af@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

On Mon, Dec 29, 2008 at 1:10 AM, Jamie Dallaire
<bad.leprechaun@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Note that the above was deliberately not to the PF, because:
>
> a) teucer is also right about this second part*
> b) it would be a really BORING win if my ripoff of comex's attempt were to
> work
> c) it would be even MORE BORING if someone were to win by ripping off my
> ripoff. So, just don't do it.

I believe your ripoff would have worked, but as I agree with points
a-c above I appreciate your failure to use the PF.
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] (no subject)
  - From: Tyler

References:
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] (no subject)
  - From: Jay Campbell
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] (no subject)
  - From: Craig Daniel
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] (no subject)
  - From: Jamie Dallaire
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] (no subject)
  - From: Craig Daniel
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] (no subject)
  - From: Jamie Dallaire

Prev by Date: Re: [s-d] [s-b] (no subject)
Next by Date: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Consultation
Previous by thread: Re: [s-d] [s-b] (no subject)
Next by thread: Re: [s-d] [s-b] (no subject)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread