Re: [s-d] [s-b] Proposal: Will it fly?

Jamie Dallaire on Mon, 29 Dec 2008 09:02:25 -0700 (MST)

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [s-d] [s-b] Proposal: Will it fly?

To: "discussion list for B Nomic" <spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Proposal: Will it fly?
From: "Jamie Dallaire" <bad.leprechaun@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 29 Dec 2008 11:02:20 -0500
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to :subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; bh=nv66cn4NzbgqO2F6/JSK0kJ+gZolDRqTtzJwJcqXG/o=; b=q+DwuRPRHyEJ6+6FPDrJDkV9wowxu16h+wQq5CSQOPeE588Ye3DtaLk6/PnG+2jzSt rshwNCtGLs14RuIk8TKcbSlAFoftIQHonvYeY567r4XUnjUkUbAPFZcHbfvGhAWeeG89 dASwnLsutqck/Wg7DaMw7Z90zF6dvaxblwV38=
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:references; b=KQUTQi/H4evROAEAzbBak+JO7LvbBm+RleSKBcn9iMxEPpA8WGa+oAnHcrtsZG7Qj/ 6QhBROlCw7tt1uDC1E2MXpYX0d+h0W5yvTh+jV+OeDnPzb8lOYcUuA1lzfIff13xgUTp teN+p2zzJotoFGCMyPgg62nLmpMVAqjrRSWjM=
In-reply-to: <dbedf4da0812282345n3f7ac90cqc6d79ccaa3c7d2b1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <49581BB6.7010808@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <81C57255-EE1F-4A70-A079-AC87FD9EBD6D@xxxxxxxxx> <4958317E.7060303@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <dbedf4da0812282345n3f7ac90cqc6d79ccaa3c7d2b1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

On Mon, Dec 29, 2008 at 2:45 AM, Tyler <wisety@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

>  I like it. It's clearer to me than the old way of saying things "violated"
> the rules.

Agreed.

But my other question is: how is this different from the may/can/shall
distinction you tried just recently? Why the switch?

BP
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] Proposal: Will it fly?
  - From: Elliott Hird
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] Proposal: Will it fly?
  - From: Ed Murphy

References:
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] Proposal: Will it fly?
  - From: Elliott Hird
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] Proposal: Will it fly?
  - From: Ed Murphy
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] Proposal: Will it fly?
  - From: Tyler

Prev by Date: Re: [s-d] [s-b] (no subject)
Next by Date: Re: [s-d] [s-b] You can't stop me breathing!
Previous by thread: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Proposal: Will it fly?
Next by thread: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Proposal: Will it fly?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread