Re: [s-d] [s-b] OK Charles

Elliott Hird on Mon, 22 Dec 2008 16:25:50 -0700 (MST)

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [s-d] [s-b] OK Charles

To: discussion list for B Nomic <spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [s-d] [s-b] OK Charles
From: Elliott Hird <penguinofthegods@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2008 23:25:41 +0000
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:mime-version:in-reply-to :references:content-type:message-id:content-transfer-encoding :subject:date:to:x-mailer:from; bh=IbyilgL6nxFMH9M3QnRq644IDLFxoeDImEcyiMD5/mg=; b=Vt6Vw519/SL721NhaLwJT/qJJfdkiYahTHNoCY3EaBgLnhltGkueYdHI0k4FXxTBGk TatUuD/B9k17t1SDrytqdf2gdXEVaE2mWHN9gwKw8xKQnPEdpY1CTKHYghMgIK3iDUoW +4UzTDpmL0O33IWHz67u2d0ccbzGntpVbJADQ=
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:content-type:message-id :content-transfer-encoding:subject:date:to:x-mailer:from; b=X6mAezS1ZyR8Y4Yhr7uGPqEK1Co/dxDkimJS6TwSIV0tNl2qNdi5/AYwJeIR20e+Zg KoQFQlZvEf3Rc8YR1JzoCAEyAtHUbtj2o/PmrERazu57QYC/hmeoHrNme7ZURPf9DkKJ 4+NNP2XtjDmdK6Y741z+BzrkiFsXPdUT5wVM0=
In-reply-to: <285c99840812221441y30e357fdydf09ed735a911a2@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <49CE3266-D658-4A72-A6D5-A9F34992ED18@xxxxxxxxx> <55b258c20812221426s640a45c6i93d9ae04acf3ef37@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <D08D595F-1123-4141-AB0A-4C2A01D7FB1B@xxxxxxxxx> <285c99840812221441y30e357fdydf09ed735a911a2@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>


On 22 Dec 2008, at 22:41, Charles Schaefer wrote:

Is there any chance of you two opening it up so other players can
collaborate as well?


If they show competence, a good understanding of what Bayes should
be, have good ideas, can code Python and can use the git revision
control system, they're welcome to contribute. :-)
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] OK Charles
  - From: comex

References:
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] OK Charles
  - From: Craig Daniel
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] OK Charles
  - From: Elliott Hird
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] OK Charles
  - From: Charles Schaefer

Prev by Date: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Not one, but TWO consultations regarding our wonderful "error-free" ruleset
Next by Date: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Not one, but TWO consultations regarding our wonderful "error-free" ruleset
Previous by thread: Re: [s-d] [s-b] OK Charles
Next by thread: Re: [s-d] [s-b] OK Charles
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread