|
Charles Schaefer on Mon, 22 Dec 2008 15:51:49 -0700 (MST)
|
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
|
Re: [s-d] [s-b] Not one, but TWO consultations regarding our wonderful "error-free" ruleset
|
- To: "discussion list for B Nomic" <spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Not one, but TWO consultations regarding our wonderful "error-free" ruleset
- From: "Charles Schaefer" <chuckles11489@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2008 14:51:43 -0800
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to :subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; bh=4HgthU9YPPaAgswsSuEgiGJ4osf4lNgo5rDMl0kaROU=; b=TfekURVmvNzKK1qXBiyL2fvML8Y6MqrEsi8/vieyAcXx0q+TS0iOMMHGgA7wtHnPsc MiSBngv36mP/JQ+3pGAGi8PN05cZAHpUWRxPI2yQhK8IvueKwYcqAksU2Qb9KxYHgFfC jeOKxqsiolvgJ9jzvl2ujFPIIn5zfHltxpBMc=
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:references; b=PawT14Sv49NlJCjYtIAyCx6mPOK6++xl0Wz8ZRHdr2Yj+PZqj/lvuVEIs6rCADG7YQ BPdZCTfUu9RrLlGbxNpWU0Xoe6K1v7FPY3qPJSMjJNbKj9bFkgVKYXDdmcKi31iVt8s2 +Vrurr8YvsiIKJjffnZ4eKViGXL9HGnISfNvg=
- In-reply-to: <144940E0-053A-4A2F-A9D8-6BD7786DBC0B@xxxxxxxxx>
- References: <285c99840812221138j2fab199bhe6a78ee16dfa3097@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <144940E0-053A-4A2F-A9D8-6BD7786DBC0B@xxxxxxxxx>
2008/12/22, Elliott Hird <penguinofthegods@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
>
> On 22 Dec 2008, at 19:38, Charles Schaefer wrote:
>
> No where do the current (fifth era) rules define
>> "random",
>>
>
> liar
Mistaken, actually. You're right, I overlooked 5E46 (right where it should
be, nitpicking and definitions). Further evidence supporting my argument in
favor of the dice server. Do you have anything to say about my other two
criticisms of your ruleset? The consultations don't actually depend on them,
just things that should be spelled out. (If they're not. It's possible I
overlooked them too.)
> --
> w1n5t0n aka
> Charles Schaefer
>
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss