Re: [s-d] [s-b] Intents

Elliott Hird on Fri, 12 Dec 2008 06:59:36 -0700 (MST)

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [s-d] [s-b] Intents

To: discussion list for B Nomic <spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Intents
From: Elliott Hird <penguinofthegods@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2008 13:59:27 +0000
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:mime-version:in-reply-to :references:content-type:message-id:content-transfer-encoding :subject:date:to:x-mailer:from; bh=y81AVfSJxxtpd0/O8X7yMXVQDYkj5lwwfqjYtuYqIa0=; b=JLeVxu3j8674+zQEiX8pwsxt8WHgHsdEPiDXT9NY2TI3jHpmitD+MZW98EfGvhEv1+ ucEF9/bXCBvjCVTTZTg9GNCpQgBfF6/rhRa0hWHvbFIUwxJETMWQp7zS1EXmqBDxW+7T Cj+b7hRPU2HBmGTW2y61zhxPjimucmwNnG0hc=
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:content-type:message-id :content-transfer-encoding:subject:date:to:x-mailer:from; b=KClobb5ryhvRWPck6sqQBP0ahwwP+mjOXXSVfZ5yvA+Zf0+2Ek8hewfW1kbEhNL3oU Jx293HXWWuDR7Ln9RTI0s9H7R6StUfnoLV9+Btyj78gQORpH4GVrgE7rDbQ8ingwKK6k UrIOuW1eTnvX+feQs2njSjc0uQE16Y9Nbunmg=
In-reply-to: <DC6B120FC56E624FB73CF444630BAB4650666B@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <6bf32280812111558q2d8ec584i31eaafe6be1e8e19@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx><1229077088.11003.14.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <5CD7770F-19C2-404A-89F3-AAD0A1D4B251@xxxxxxxxx> <DC6B120FC56E624FB73CF444630BAB4650666B@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

On 12 Dec 2008, at 13:38, Alexander Smith wrote:

From 5e2, yes. They're still mentioned in 5e28, not explicitly, but
clearly enough to indicate that they're some sort of property, if not
obviously a switch. Or does repealing text from one rule now suddenly
repeal it from all other rules too?


Let's just infer everything. "Ownable" is not enough to imply the full,
specific, definition.

Anyway, can we Approve this and get on with the game?
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] Intents
  - From: Warrigal

References:
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] Intents
  - From: Alex Smith
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] Intents
  - From: Elliott Hird
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] Intents
  - From: Alexander Smith

Prev by Date: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Intents
Next by Date: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Intents
Previous by thread: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Intents
Next by thread: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Intents
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread